Cylinder Gap Test

 

barrel length Buffalo Bore, .38 special, 158 gr. soft lead SWC-HC
(std. pressure, short barrel, low flash, heavy)
.006" cylinder gap .001" cylinder gap no cylinder gap
18" 1088 1100 1104
17" 1039 1066 1088
16" 1040 1055 1085
15" 1035 1060 1118
14" 1034 1060 1105
13" 1019 1062 1106
12" 1009 1031 1079
11" 996 1035 1073
10" 989 1013 1069
9" 976 1002 1060
8" 977 990 1041
7" 965 991 1030
6" 942 950 1000
5" 934 952 975
4" 894 920 952
3" 863 883 908
2" 794 818 846

Other Resources

BBTI is not the end-all of ballistics testing, just one more component available for the common good.  In addition to extensive discussion about ballistics to be found at many gun forums, here are some other great resources pertaining to ballistics testing you should check out.  (And if you would like to recommend a site to list here, please send an email.)
  • BrassFetcher:  excellent resource, with an emphasis on bullet performance in ballistic gelatin
  • The Box O' Truth:  testing ammo penetration through various barriers
  • Terminal Ballistics Research:  Specializes in the research of cartridge & projectile performance, using hard data gathered from 20 years of hunting game.

Acknowledgements

We'd like to personally and specifically thank Pat Childs at Fin & Feather in Iowa City, as he not only helped get most of our ammunition and other supplies, he was the brilliant gunsmith who worked with us to make this insane project much more practical.  Without his help all of this would have been much more difficult and perhaps impossible.  Anyone who uses our data owes him a debt of gratitude.

And thanks to our spouses, who were not just tolerant but enthusiastically supportive of this rather nutty project.

Disclaimer

This project, and all of its results, is only our fault.  We (well, Jim K, mostly) paid for everything ourselves, and we did not receive any kind of sponsorship or remuneration from anyone.  We did all the work.  We used products we were either familiar with, or because they were what was available, and mentioning them by name does not constitute an endorsement of any kind.  Furthermore, the data is provided purely for entertainment purposes - to better facilitate arguments over what ammo or caliber or gun is "best."  How you use the data is entirely up to you.  And if you think you could do better, feel free to spend the money and do the work and publish your own results.  Or not.  Your choice.